v

Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 101-107.doi: 10.19543/j.cnki.1673-4556.20260331.001cstr: 32418.14.j.cnki.1673-4556.20260331.001

• Animal Genetics and Breeding • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of non-genetic factors on growth and reproductive traits of Angus cattle and correlation analysis among traits

Xuxin Zhu1(), Penghui Guo2, Cheng Peng1, Guohu Sun1, Honghe Li2, Yuhua Shen2, Juanshan Zheng2, Shengwei Pei2, Xiaofang Feng2()   

  1. 1.Gansu Provincial General Station of Animal Husbandry Technology Extension, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu
    2.College of Life Science and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu
  • Received:2025-10-09 Online:2026-03-26 Published:2026-06-17
  • Contact: Xiaofang Feng E-mail:zhuxuxinfei@163.com;xiaofangf@yeah.net

Abstract:

Objective This study assessed the influence of yearling weight (YW) and body condition score (BCS) on the reproductive performance of Angus cattle, thereby establishing a data-driven support system. It provides a reference for the selection and breeding of the Angus core herd and the formulation of a scientifically sound Angus cattle selection and breeding program. Method Data was collected and organized on two growth traits—YW and BCS, and three reproductive traits—age at first calving (AFC), age at first service (AFS), and calving interval (CI)—from six large-scale Angus cattle farms in Ningxia between 2012 and 2023. Statistical analysis was conducted using SAS software (version 9.2) to examine the effects of birth farm-year interaction and birth year-season interaction on AFC, YW, and BCS; the effects of birth site-year interaction, birth year-season interaction, breeding farm-year interaction, and breeding year-season interaction on AFS; and the effects of birth farm-year interaction, birth year-season interaction, breeding site-year interaction, breeding year-season interaction, and parity on CI. The study utilized animal models to investigate the genetic and phenotypic correlations among various traits. Result The results demonstrated that non-genetic factors had highly significant effects (P<0.01) on age at AFC, age at AFS, CI, YW, and BCS. The genetic correlation between AFC and AFS was moderate (0.45), with a corresponding phenotypic correlation of 0.43. Conversely, AFC exhibited a negative genetic correlation (-0.26) and phenotypic correlation (-0.22) with CI. The analysis of growth traits (BCS, YW) and reproductive traits (AFC, AFS, CI) revealed that, except for a weak positive correlation between BCS and CI (0.001) (P<0.001), all other growth traits (BCS, YW) displayed negative genetic and phenotypic correlations with reproductive traits (AFC, AFS, CI). Notably, YW showed a strong positive genetic correlation (0.83) and phenotypic correlation (0.76) with BCS. Conclusion In conclusion, under conditions characterized by strong environmental influences, the reproductive efficiency of Angus cattle can be enhanced by either moderating the rate of annual weight gain or by selecting early-maturing, low-body-weight cows as foundational herd parents, thereby indirectly reducing the age at first calving and the calving interval.

Key words: Angus cattle, Reproductive traits, Yearling weight, Body condition score, Genetic parameters

CLC Number: 

  • S823

Table1

Descriptive statistics of reproductive traits, yearling weight and body condition score of Angus cattle"

性状Traits数量N平均值Mean标准差SD变异系数CV/%最大值Max最小值Min
初产日龄AFC/d1026903.2310.2611.991119.00576.00
初配月龄AFS/月52916.752.4714.7523.0013.00
产犊间隔CI/d558386.6548.8112.62571.00303.00
周岁体重YW/kg1949428.5067.6615.79693.00305.00
体况评分BCS/分162384.546.818.0597.0061.00

Table 2

Results of non-genetic factor significance test of reproductive traits, yearling weight and body condition score of Angus cattle (F value)"

性状Traits出生场-年Birth farms-year出生年-季Birth year-season胎次Parity配种场-年Service farms-year配种年-季Service year-season
初产日龄AFC72.44**58.36**
初配月龄AFS6.84**232.67**107.73**6.06**
产犊间隔CI15.98**30.98**20.26**
周岁体重YW58.45**184.62**
体况评分BCS32.70**20.91**

Table3

Genetic and phenotypic correlations among traits in Angus cattle"

性状Traits初产日龄AFC初配月龄AFS产犊间隔CI周岁体重YW体况评分BCS
初产日龄AFC1.000.45-0.26-0.34-0.81
初配月龄AFS0.431.00--0.10-0.14
产犊间隔CI-0.22-1.00-0.15-0.02
周岁体重YW-0.11-0.13-0.051.000.83
体况评分BCS-0.79-0.250.0010.761.00
[1] THOMPSON L R, BECK M R, BUSKIRK D D, et al. Cow efficiency: modeling the biological and economic output of a Michigan beef herd[J]. Translational Animal Science, 2020, 4(3): txaa166.
[2] MIGLIOR F, FLEMING A, MALCHIODI F, et al. A 100-Year Review: identification and genetic selection of economically important traits in dairy cattle[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017, 100(12): 10251-10271.
[3] WASIKE C B. Genetic evaluation of growth and reproductive performance of the Kenya Boran cattle[J]. MSc Thesis. Egerton University, 2006,108.
[4] CAVANI L, GARCIA D A, CARREÑO L O, et al. Estimates of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in Brahman cattle breed[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 93(7): 3287-3291.
[5] 王杰. 提升肉牛繁育效率的技术措施[J]. 畜牧业环境, 2025(11): 131-132.
WANG J. Technical measures to improve the breeding efficiency of beef cattle[J]. Animal Industry and Environment, 2025(11): 131-132.
[6] 杨明路, 张海亮, 罗汉鹏, 等. 基于智能项圈系统荷斯坦牛发情相关指标的遗传参数估计及全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(5): 995-1006.
YANG M L, ZHANG H L, LUO H P, et al. Estimation of genetic parameters and genome-wide association study of heated indicators in Holstein cattle based on collar-mounted device[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(5): 995-1006.
[7] 师睿, 李珊珊, 张海亮, 等. 中国荷斯坦牛繁殖性状的基因型与环境互作[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(9): 3968-3977.
SHI R, LI S S, ZHANG H L, et al. Genotype by environment interaction of fertility traits for the Holstein cattle in China[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2024, 55(9): 3968-3977.
[8] ELER J P, BIGNARDI A B, FERRAZ J B, et al. Genetic relationships among traits related to reproduction and growth of Nelore females[J]. Theriogenology, 2014, 82(5): 708-714.
[9] MALHADO C H M, RAMOS A A, CARNEIRO P L S, et al. Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos para características reprodutivas e produtivas de búfalas mestiças no Brasil[J]. Revista Brasileira De Saúde E Produção Animal, 2009, 10(4): 830-839.
[10] LOPEZ B I, KIM T H, MAKUMBE M T, et al. Variance components estimation for farrowing traits of three purebred pigs in Korea[J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2017, 30(9): 1239-1244.
[11] BOLIGON A A, DE ALBUQUERQUE L G, MERCADANTE M E Z, et al. Study of relations among age at first calving, average weight gains and weights from weaning to maturity in Nellore cattle[J]. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2010, 39(4): 746-751.
[12] CHASAMA G L, HEPELWA A S, CHIBWANA F D, et al. Development of breeding objective for Tanganyika shorthorn zebu[J]. Tanzania Veterinary Journal, 2024, 38(2): 11-20.
[13] PFEIFER L F M, DE LIMA R A, NAKASHIMA S H, et al. Early versus late body condition score loss in dairy cows: reproductive performance[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2023, 55(3): 149.
[14] BINYAMEEN M, KHAN M I U R, HAQUE M N UL, et al. Effect of prepartum dietary energy level on production and reproduction in nili Ravi buffaloes[J]. Animals, 2022, 12(13): 1683.
[15] DEZETTER C, BIDAN F, DELABY L, et al. Association between body condition profiles, milk production, and reproduction performance in Holstein and Normande cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2024, 107(12): 11621-11638.
[16] 王淑辉. 肉牛线性外貌评定和不同经济类型牛评定方法的研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2003.
WANG S H. Study on linear appearance evaluation of beef cattle and evaluation methods of different economic types of cattle[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2003.
[17] 闫向民, 董明明, 付会英, 等. 非遗传因素对新疆褐牛肉用品系生长性状的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2023, 59(11): 112-118.
YAN X M, DONG M M, FU H Y, et al. Effects of non-genetic factors on growth traits of Xinjiang brown beef lines[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 59(11): 112-118.
[18] 陈紫薇, 师睿, 罗汉鹏, 等. 宁夏地区荷斯坦牛青年牛繁殖性状遗传参数估计[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(2): 344-351.
CHEN Z W, SHI R, LUO H P, et al. Estimation of genetic parameters of reproductive traits of Holstein heifers in Ningxia[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52(2): 344-351.
[19] ARMENGOL R, FRAILE L, BACH A. Key performance indicators used by dairy consultants during the evaluation of re-productive performance in a first visit[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2022, 9: 871079.
[20] GAVAN C. Age of first calving and subsequent fertility and survival in Holstein Friesian cattle[J]. Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 2014, 47(2): 37-40.
[21] GETAHUN K, TADESSE M, HUNDIE D. Analysis of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in crossbred dairy cattle maintained at holetta agricultural research center[J]. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research, 2020, 39(1): 10-16.
[22] HAILE A, JOSHI B K, AYALEW W, et al. Genetic evaluation of Ethiopian Boran cattle and their crosses with Holstein Friesian in central Ethiopia: milk production traits[J]. Animal, 2009, 3(4): 486-493.
[23] KUMAR A, MANDAL A, GUPTA A K, et al. Genetic evaluation of reproductive traits in Jersey crossbred heifers at an organized farm of eastern India[J]. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 2016: 619-624.
[24] REKSEN O, HAVREVOLL Ø, GRÖHN Y T, et al. Relationships among body condition score, milk constituents, and postpartum luteal function in Norwegian dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2002, 85(6): 1406-1415.
[25] CARTHY T R, RYAN D P, FITZGERALD A M, et al. Genetic relationships between detailed reproductive traits and performance traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, 99(2): 1286-1297.
[26] BOURDON R M, BRINKS J S. Genetic, environmental and phenotypic relationships among gestation length, birth weight, growth traits and age at first calving in beef cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1982, 55(3): 543-553.
[27] BOLIGON A A, ALBUQUERQUE L G. Genetic parameters and relationships of heifer pregnancy and age at first calving with weight gain, yearling and mature weight in Nelore cattle[J]. Livestock Science, 2011, 141(1): 12-16.
[28] SCHMIDT P I, CAMPOS G S, LÔBO R B, et al. Genetic analysis of age at first calving, accumulated productivity, stayability and mature weight of Nellore females[J]. Theriogenology, 2018, 108: 81-87.
[29] LACERDA V V, CAMPOS G S, ROSO V M, et al. Effect of mature size and body condition of Nelore females on the reproductive performance[J]. Theriogenology, 2018, 118: 27-33.
[1] Weisheng Chen, Liwang Li, Hua Peng. Research on the current status, historical evolution, and future development path of beef cattle industry in China [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 10-17.
[2] Hong Chen. Breeding and hybrid utilization of local Chinese cattle breeds [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 18-24.
[3] Lisheng Miao, Congyong Wang, Yang Cao, Yumin Zhao. Development of the beef cattle seed industry and genetic improvement pathways [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 25-30.
[4] Hai Wang, Daoning Yu, Chun Zhang, Qianqian Chu, Junjun Zhao, Daiyang Zhang, Congyong Wang. Research on innovation and industrialization of breeding technology of Huaxi cattle [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 38-44.
[5] Xiangmin Yan, Juan Geng, Guangwei Yang, Zhen Ma, Liang Gao, Jianming Liu, Xixia Huang. Technological innovation paths and systematic new practices for beef cattle genetic improvement in Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 45-52.
[6] Xiaoyun Chen, Donghui Fang, Jun Yi, Maozhong Fu, Jia Gan, Aguo Yueda, Yi Shi, Xiaodong Deng, Xiaoqin Ma, Ying Chen, Ruijuan Cao, Wei Wang. Current situation and high-quality development suggestions of the cattle industry in Sichuan province [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 53-59.
[7] Zhuangbing Li, Lei Yang, Weiwei Lei, Xianguang Ren, Zhonggong Wang, Yongjun Cai, Wei Chen, Xifeng Zhang. Effects of body brushing on intestinal microbiota structure, serum metabolism and antioxidant capacity in Bohai Black cattle [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 60-71.
[8] Duanyang Ren, Wenxia Li, Xinpei Wang, Xi Wang. Population genetic structure analysis and molecular mating of Jinnan cattle based on genome-wide SNP loci [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 72-80.
[9] Hai Jin, Shuanping Zhao, Qian Li, Huibin Zhang, Xinyi Du, Qinggang Li, Lei Xu. Progress report on crossbreeding improvement of Dabieshan cattle [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 81-86.
[10] Liya Guo, Yang Yuan, Jinxiao Wei, Guangying Zhao, Yueyu Bai, Wei Zhang. Research on the application of the major germplasm innovation technologies for local cattle breeds empowered by digital and intelligent technologies [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(6): 87-95.
[11] Xiaoge Zhang, Yanduo Zhou, Jianzhang Li, Luping Ma, Jun Li, Ruijie Hao, Zijing Zhang, Yun Ma, Tianliu Zhang, Chengcheng Liang. Tissue expression and differentiation characteristics of genes regulating muscle fiber types in Xinyang buffalo [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(5): 32-42.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!