v

Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 125-130.doi: 10.19543/j.cnki.1673-4556.20260404.002cstr: 32418.14.j.cnki.1673-4556.20260404.002

• Protection and Utilization of Animal Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles    

Performance testing of a hybridized combination between Duroc and Gannan Tibetan pig

Changling Ke1,2(), Kui Cao1, Jing Liu1, Daibo Fu1, Sijing Zeng1, Jian Zhang1, Gongxiu Yu4, Yao Hu3, Xiong Xiong1, Shiming Xu1, Quanyong Zhou1()   

  1. 1.Jiujiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiujiang, 332105, Jiangxi
    2.Jiujiang Agricultural Science Society, Jiujiang, 332105, Jiangxi
    3.Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, 330200, Jiangxi
    4.People's Government of Henggang Town, Ruichang City, Ruichang, 332227, Jiangxi
  • Received:2025-10-23 Online:2026-03-26 Published:2026-06-17
  • Contact: Quanyong Zhou E-mail:1642242961@qq.com;89629577@qq.com

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to evaluate growth performance, slaughter characteristics, and meat quality traits in hybrid offspring from Duroc and Gannan Tibetan pig crossbreeding, while analyzing changes in production efficiency. Method Three Duroc boars were crossbred with three Gannan Tibetan sows, with their offspring divided into groups for rearing. Upon reaching physical maturity, two pigs from each group were randomly selected and slaughtered to determine the various production parameters. Result The results showed that compared with Gannan Tibetan pigs, the body weight of Dugan hybrid offspring was significantly increased (P < 0.05), the slaughter rate and lean meat rate were significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant change in crude protein content in longissimus dorsi muscle (P > 0.05), but the meat color score was significantly reduced(P < 0.05), and the muscle fiber diameter was significantly thicker (P < 0.05). The muscle fiber density decreased significantly (P < 0.05), but the flavor amino acid content decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Conclusion The findings indicate that using Duroc as the sire effectively enhances growth performance in hybrids, yet leads to a noticeable decline in pork quality.

Key words: Hybrid pig, Performance testing, Body characteristics, Muscle fiber characteristics, Amino acid content

CLC Number: 

  • S831

Table 1

Comparison of carcass traits, meat quality traits, meat nutritional components and muscle fiber tissue characteristics between Duroc×Gannan hybrid pig and Gannan Tibetan pig"

性状

Traits

项目

Items

赣南藏香猪

Gannan Tibetan pig

杜赣杂交猪

Duroc×Gannan hybrid pig

t值

t-value

P

P-value

胴体性状

Carcass traits

活重/kg39.43±1.0582.50±3.96-17.940.000
胴体重/kg25.16±1.7957.90±3.08-16.680.000
胴体斜长/cm60.83±5.2575.08±2.20-5.990.001
背膘厚/cm2.26±0.582.60±0.33-1.1630.281
皮厚/cm0.40±0.020.32±0.072.200.064
肋骨数/根14.0014.00
眼肌面积/cm221.70±7.0832.80±3.55-3.250.014
屠宰率/%63.81±4.0970.19±2.22-3.130.017
瘦肉率/%52.11±4.0560.34±2.10-4.160.004
脂肪率/%17.29±8.7119.40±1.93-0.6050.564
皮率/%15.23±3.469.86±1.753.2050.015
骨率/%15.38±2.8210.40±0.804.260.004

肉质性状

Meat quality traits

pH45 min6.41±0.146.09±0.252.300.051
pH24h5.70±0.085.56±0.161.620.143
pH变化幅度0.71±0.070.53±0.181.840.103
肉色评分5.68±0.173.30±0.2416.720.000
肉色L*43.96±1.4541.88±6.470.620.553
肉色a*9.17±1.4215.42±1.19-7.560.000
肉色b*6.49±0.862.32±1.614.680.002

猪肉营养成分

Nutritional composition of pork

水分/(g·100g-1)73.98±0.9772.50±0.825.8820.002
粗脂肪/(g·100g-1)0.90±0.432.40±0.91-3.010.020
粗蛋白质/(g·100g-1)23.62±1.1221.47±1.010.1630.877
肌苷酸/(mg·kg-1)986.97±28.461414.33±123.55-9.1130.000
猪肉肌纤维组织特性Muscle fiber tissue characteristics of pork直径/μm30.94±2.9474.88±7.02-11.670.000
密度/(根·mm-2)1939.00±79.93378.34±119.0722.7880.000

Table 2

Comparison of amino acid content in pork between Duroc×Gannan hybrid pig and Gannan Tibetan pig"

项目Items赣南藏香猪 Gannan Tibetan pig杜赣杂交猪Duroc×Gannan hybrid pigt值t-valuePP-value
天冬氨酸Aspartic acid41.78±0.9920.08±0.5345.550.000
谷氨酸Glutamic acid24.85±0.5036.52±0.90-23.380.000
胱氨酸Cystine4.90±2.215.31±2.23-0.290.781
丝氨酸Serine7.65±0.238.53±0.21-6.310.000
甘氨酸Glycine7.62±0.409.30±0.41-6.390.000
组氨酸Histidine4.07±1.289.87±0.44-10.470.000
精氨酸Arginine14.73±1.1513.92±0.371.6580.136
苏氨酸Threonine10.21±0.7710.20±0.230.020.988
丙氨酸Alanine10.50±0.3212.52±0.29-10.320.000
脯氨酸Proline6.03±0.276.65±0.23-3.840.005
酪氨酸Tyrosine6.04±0.137.48±0.29-9.350.000
缬氨酸Valine9.19±0.1311.03±0.22-15.160.0000
蛋氨酸Methionine1.81±0.024.72±0.58-9.750.000
异亮氨酸Isoleucine9.05±0.1510.62±0.28-10.230.000
亮氨酸Leucine14.46±0.2917.50±0.38-13.350.000
苯丙氨酸Phenylalanine7.24±0.158.76±0.21-12.630.000
赖氨酸Lysine26.00±0.5619.97±0.4119.920.000
呈味氨基酸Flavor amino acids98.04±1.4994.67±2.452.440.041
必需氨基酸Essential amino acids77.95±1.6282.80±2.05-3.950.004
总氨基酸Total amino acids206.12±5.55207.67±5.01-0.460.659

Table 3

The fatty acid composition of Duroc×Gannan hybrid pig"

项目Items杜赣杂交猪Duroc×Gannan hybrid pig/%项目Items杜赣杂交猪Duroc×Gannan hybrid pig/%
月桂酸C12:00.093±0.050α-亚麻酸C18:3n30.25±0.053
肉豆蔻酸C14:01.30±0.091花生酸C20:00.24±0.023
十五烷酸C15:00.035±0.0090顺-11-二十碳一烯酸C20:10.96±0.11
棕榈酸C16:025.24±0.56顺,顺-11,14-二十碳二烯酸 C20:20.38±0.055
棕榈油酸C16:13.41±0.20顺,顺,顺-8,11,14-二十碳三烯酸甲酯C20:3n60.11±0.027
十七烷酸C17:00.18±0.039花生四烯酸C20:4n60.80±0.25
硬脂酸C18:012.33±0.73饱和脂肪酸SFA39.42±1.00
油酸C18:147.19±1.04不饱和脂肪酸UFA60.54±0.96
亚油酸C18:2n6c7.43±1.39UFA/SFA1.54±0.062
[1] 张海峰, 陈锐, 王祖力, 等. 一线城市城镇居民猪肉消费偏好及影响因素研究: 基于北上广调查数据的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2023(8): 131-134.
ZHANG H F, CHEN R, WANG Z L, et al. Research on the pork consumption preferences and influencing factors of urban residents in first-tier cities: an analysis based on survey data from Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou[J]. Price (Theory & Practice), 2023(8): 131-134.
[2] 黄奇奇, 熊平文, 熊亭, 等.妊娠后期及泌乳期添加金荞麦茎叶粉对赣南藏香猪产后仔猪生长性能、血清生化及细胞因子含量的影响[J].中国饲料, 2026(1):70-75.
HUANG Q Q, XIONG P W, XIONG T, et al. Effects of adding buckwheat stem and leaf meal during late gestation and lactation on the growth performance,serum biochemistry,and cytokine contents of postpartum piglets in Gannan Tibetan pigs[J]. China Feed, 2026(1): 70-75.
[3] 陈小连, 周泉勇, 宋文静, 等. 赣南藏香猪与杜长大商品猪胴体性状和肉品质比较分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2020, 42(2): 282-290.
CHEN X L, ZHOU Q Y, SONG W J, et al. Comparison of carcass traits and meat quality between Tibetan pig in south Jiangxi and duroc × Yorkshire × Landrace commercial pigs[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 42(2): 282-290.
[4] 郑瑞强. 赣南香猪产业发展的问题与对策研究[J]. 中国猪业, 2020, 15(4): 65-67, 72.
ZHENG R Q. Study on the problems and countermeasures of the development of Gannan Xiang pig industry[J]. China Swine Industry, 2020, 15(4): 65-67, 72.
[5] 韩雪, 付晓利, 粟朝芝, 等. 不同杂交组合猪屠宰性能和肉质性状比较分析[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2016(19): 128-130.
HAN X, FU X L, SU C Z, et al. Comparative analysis of slaughter performance and meat quality traits of different hybrid combinations of pigs[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016(19): 128-130.
[6] 张彦, 熊和丽, 刘韶娜, 等. 撒坝猪及其杂交后代的屠宰性能与肉品质比较分析[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2025, 61(10): 135-141.
ZHANG Y, XIONG H L, LIU S N, et al. Comparative analysis of slaughter performance and meat quality of Saba pig and its hybrid offspring[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2025, 61(10): 135-141.
[7] 刘庆雨,于永生,张琪,等.藏猪及杜藏杂交猪胴体性能及肉质品质对比研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2025,61(05):153-156.
LIU Q Y, YU Y S, ZHANG Q, et al. Comparative sudy on carcass performance and meat quality of Tibetan pigs and Duroc×Tibetan hybrid pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal science, 2025,61(05):153-156
[8] 梁国明, 彭中镇, 刘榜, 等. 长×大×通、大×长×通杂交猪及其亲本的生长性能、胴体性状和肉品质比较研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2017, 44(4): 1009-1015.
LIANG G M, PENG Z Z, LIU B, et al. Study on comparing growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality among Landrace × Yorkshire × Tongcheng, Yorkshire × landrace × Tongcheng hybrid pigs and their parental line[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2017, 44(4): 1009-1015.
[9] 李林峰, 吴卓穗, 王盼, 等. 中国主要地方猪资源杂交利用屠宰性能对比分析[J]. 广东畜牧兽医科技, 2024, 49(4): 24-34.
LI L F, WU Z S, WANG P, et al. Comparative analysis on the slaughter performance of major endemic pig resources in China[J]. Guangdong Journal of Animal and Veterinary Science, 2024, 49(4): 24-34.
[10] 刘韶娜, 张斌, 相德才, 等. 迪庆藏猪杂交后代生长性能及屠宰性能比较研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(19): 181-184.
LIU S N, ZHANG B, XIANG D C, et al. Comparison of growth performance and slaughter performance of Diqing Tibetan pig hybrids[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(19): 181-184.
[11] 吕雪峰, 高维明, 郑文新, 等. B超活体测定羊眼肌面积与瘦肉率的相关研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(2): 344-345.
LV X F, GAO W M, ZHENG W X, et al. The correlation research of loin area by living measurement with B-mode ultrasound and carcass lean percentage[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 51(2): 344-345.
[12] 陈璐, 金邦荃, 刘兴余, 等. 猪骨骼肌组织学特性与猪肉嫩度关系的研究[J]. 食品科学, 2009, 30(1): 10-14.
CHEN L, JIN B Q, LIU X Y, et al. Study on relationships between histomorphological characteristics of skeletal muscle and pork tenderness[J]. Food Science, 2009, 30(1): 10-14.
[13] 殷运菊, 郭秋平, 方正锋, 等. 氨基酸的呈味机制及其对肉品风味的影响研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2025, 61(5): 95-102.
YIN Y J, GUO Q P, FANG Z F, et al. Research progress on amino acid flavor mechanism and its impact on meat flavor[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2025, 61(5): 95-102.
[1] Xinyu Sun, Xuejiao Chen, Ye Liu, Axiu Guo, Hao Zhang, Bo Zhang. Measurement and comparative analysis of body size, slaughter performance, and meat quality of the recessive white feather chicken [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(5): 96-100.
[2] Fengjuan Liu, Tiecheng Wu, Junyang Liu, Tao Wang, Leqi Yi, Yulin Gao, Xingang Yan, Bin Liu. Research progress on breeding and selection techniques for domestic animal genomes [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(5): 70-78.
[3] Qingzheng Wang, Na Yang, Huie Wang, Ruihua Dang, Yinamujiang·Yalimaimaiti, Mubareke·Muhaimaite, Aierken·Alimu, Tuerdibake·Tuerxuntuoheti, Tianxin Zhao, Nurikayahan·Aili, Gemingguli·Muhatai. Current status of hybridization and breed conservation recommendations for Turpan fighting cocks [J]. Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2026, 22(5): 116-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!