中国畜禽种业 ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (9): 12-25.doi: 10.19543/j.cnki.1673-4556.20260602.003cstr: 32418.14.j.cnki.1673-4556.20260805.001

• 畜禽干细胞基础研究与应用 •    下一篇

家畜早期胚胎发育及胚胎来源干细胞研究进展

何金运1, 赵子墨1, 张啸微1, 冯志强1, 高登峰2, 郅明雷1()   

  1. 1. 中国农业大学生物学院/畜禽生物育种全国重点实验室/分子设计育种前沿科学中心,北京 100093
    2. 四川农业大学动物科学技术学院,四川 成都 611130
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-31 出版日期:2026-09-26 发布日期:2026-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 郅明雷
  • 作者简介:
    何金运(2006—),女,四川成都人,中国农业大学生物学院2024级生物科学(理科试验班)本科生。现阶段在郅明雷副教授指导下开展科研训练。大学生创新创业训练计划国家级项目负责人。研究方向:生命科学,E-mail:
    高登峰(1993—),男,山西柳林人,博士,研究方向:家畜胚胎发育及生物信息学,E-mail:四川农业大学博士后。2023年于中国农业大学获得理学博士学位,师从韩建永教授。致力于以生物信息学方法解析物种发育及调控。具体方向包括:家畜早期胚胎发育及其调控机制解析,昼夜节律调控脂肪沉积等。以共同第一作者身份在Nature Communi-cations、Cell Reports、Aging Cell等国际主流期刊上发表了多篇学术论文。主持国家自然科学基金青年基金项目。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(32402757); 国家自然科学基金(32502849); 国家科技重大专项(2025ZD0552101); 重庆英才大会首届卓越工程师大赛揭榜攻坚赛揭榜应征项目; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2025TC140); 中国农业大学2115人才工程

Advances in early embryonic development and embryo-derived stem cells in livestock

Jinyun He1, Zimo Zhao1, Xiaowei Zhang1, Zhiqiang Feng1, Dengfeng Gao2, Minglei Zhi1()   

  1. 1. College of Biological Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100093
    2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan
  • Received:2025-12-31 Online:2026-09-26 Published:2026-09-10
  • Contact: Minglei Zhi

摘要:

家畜胚胎来源干细胞分离自家畜早期胚胎,兼具自我更新能力与多向分化潜能。胚胎干细胞的分离建系本质上是对体内多能性状态的捕获与体外维持;而家畜早期胚胎/胚外组织发育过程中的多能性动态演变,则为界定胚胎来源干细胞的多能性特征提供了关键参照。本综述聚焦猪、牛、羊等家畜的早期胚胎发育及其胚胎来源干细胞研究,系统梳理了合子基因组激活、第一/二次胚胎谱系特化及胚胎原肠化等关键事件,并从发育时序、信号通路、分子表达和表型特征等维度,比较了家畜早期胚胎发育与人类、小鼠的异同。在此基础上,本文进一步按发育潜能对胚胎来源干细胞进行归类,从扩展多能干细胞、胚胎干细胞和胚外干细胞三个层面综述了家畜相关研究的最新进展,系统比较了三类干细胞在分离时期、细胞与分子特征、关键培养体系及多能性/发育潜能等方面的差异,并展望了其在胚胎及器官发育模拟、遗传育种改良和细胞培养肉生产等方面的应用前景。此外,本文还深入讨论了家畜胚胎来源干细胞研究面临的瓶颈与挑战,涵盖多能性维持与定向分化的精准调控、嵌合体形成及跨物种应用、基因编辑效率与准确性的提升、干细胞胚胎克隆技术等,并对未来研究方向进行了展望,以期为家畜胚胎发育和干细胞研究提供参考。

关键词: 家畜, 胚胎发育, 胚胎来源干细胞

Abstract:

Embryo-derived stem cells derived from livestock early embryos possess both self-renewal capacity and multidirectional differentiation potential. The isolation and establishment of embryo-derived stem cell lines essentially represent the capture of the pluripotent state from in vivo embryos and its in vitro maintenance; the dynamic evolution of pluripotency during early embryonic and extraembryonic development in livestock provides a key reference for defining the pluripotent characteristics of embryo-derived stem cells. This review focuses on early embryonic development and embryo-derived stem cell research in livestock such as pigs, cattle, and sheep. It systematically outlines key events including zygotic genome activation, the first and second lineage specification, and gastrulation, and compares the similarities and differences between early embryonic development in livestock and that in humans and mice from perspectives such as developmental timing, signaling pathways, molecular expression, and phenotypic features. On this basis, the review further categorizes embryo-derived stem cells according to their developmental potential, summarizing the latest research progress in livestock from three aspects: expanded pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells, and extra-embryonic stem cells. It systematically compares the differences between these three types of stem cells in terms of isolation stage, cellular and molecular characteristics, key culture systems, and pluripotency and developmental potential, and discusses their application prospects in areas such as embryo and organ development modeling, genetic breeding improvement, and cell-cultured meat production. Furthermore, the review delves into the bottlenecks and challenges faced by research on livestock embryo-derived stem cells, covering precise regulation of pluripotency maintenance and directed differentiation, chimera formation and cross-species applications, improvement of gene editing efficiency and accuracy, stem cell embryo cloning technologies, among others. It also provides an outlook on future research directions, aiming to offer references for studies on livestock embryonic development and stem cells.

Key words: Livestock, Embryonic development, Embryo-derived stem cells

中图分类号: 

  • S81

图1

家畜(猪、牛、羊)、小鼠与人类胚胎关键发育事件及发生时间的综合比较 注:E、ICM、TE、TB、EPI、PrE、ExE、VE、AC、YS、PS、Meso和Ecto分别代表胚胎发育天数、内细胞团、滋养外胚层、滋养层、上胚层、原始内胚层、胚外外胚层、内脏内胚层、羊膜腔、卵黄囊、原条、中胚层和外胚层。本图使用Adobe Illustrator 2024绘制。"

图2

家畜胚胎来源干细胞培养体系汇总 注:本图汇总了猪、牛、羊等常见畜禽胚胎来源干细胞的基础培养基、饲养层、基础补充剂、细胞因子和小分子抑制剂。EPSC、naïve ESC、formative ESC、primed ESC、XEN和TSC分别代表扩展多能干细胞、原始态胚胎干细胞、形成态胚胎干细胞、启动态胚胎干细胞、胚外内胚层干细胞和滋养层干细胞。本图使用Adobe Illustrator 2024绘制。"

图3

家畜胚胎来源干细胞应用前景 注:本图使用Adobe Illustrator 2024绘制。"

[1]
HU B J, JIN H, SHI Y, et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq reveals the earliest lineage specification and X chromosome dosage compensation in bovine preimplantation embryos[J]. The FASEB Journal, 2024, 38(4): e23492.
[2]
SCATOLIN G N, MING H, WANG Y J, et al. Single-cell transcriptional landscapes of bovine peri-implantation development[J]. iScience, 2024, 27(4): 109605.
[3]
CAI L, HYUN S H, KIM E. Stem cell factor’s role in enhancing the quality of fertilized and cloned porcine embryos for improved embryonic stem cell derivation[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2023, 10: 1285530.
[4]
BOTIGELLI R C, GUILTINAN C, ARCANJO R B, et al. In vitro gametogenesis from embryonic stem cells in livestock species: recent advances, opportunities, and challenges to overcome[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 101: skad137.
[5]
BAZER F W, JOHNSON G A. Early embryonic development in agriculturally important species[J]. Animals, 2024, 14(13): 1882.
[6]
FRIEDLI M, TRONO D. The developmental control of transposable elements and the evolution of higher species[J]. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 2015, 31: 429-451.
[7]
TADROS W, LIPSHITZ H D. The maternal-to-zygotic transition: a play in two acts[J]. Development, 2009, 136(18): 3033-3042.
[8]
DU Z Q, LIANG H, LIU X M, et al. Single cell RNA-seq reveals genes vital to in vitro fertilized embryos and parthenotes in pigs[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 14393.
[9]
JUKAM D, SHARIATI S A M, SKOTHEIM J M. Zygotic genome activation in vertebrates[J]. Developmental Cell, 2017, 42(4): 316-332.
[10]
GASSLER J, KOBAYASHI W, GÁSPÁR I, et al. Zygotic genome activation by the totipotency pioneer factor Nr5a2[J]. Science, 2022, 378(6626): 1305-1315.
[11]
MIAO L Y, TANG Y, BONNEAU A R, et al. The landscape of pioneer factor activity reveals the mechanisms of chromatin reprogramming and genome activation[J]. Molecular Cell, 2022, 82(5): 986-1002.e9.
[12]
ZHAI J L, XIAO Z Y, WANG Y M, et al. Human embryonic development: from peri-implantation to gastrulation[J]. Trends in Cell Biology, 2022, 32(1): 18-29.
[13]
ZHI M L, ZHANG J Y, TANG Q Z, et al. Generation and characterization of stable pig pregastrulation epiblast stem cell lines[J]. Cell Research, 2022, 32(4): 383-400.
[14]
KONG Q R, YANG X, ZHANG H, et al. Lineage specification and pluripotency revealed by transcriptome analysis from oocyte to blastocyst in pig[J]. The FASEB Journal, 2020, 34(1): 691-705.
[15]
GIRALDO A M, DECOURCY K, BALL S F, et al. Gene expression of Dnmt1 isoforms in porcine oocytes, embryos, and somatic cells[J]. Cellular Reprogramming, 2013, 15(4): 309-321.
[16]
LU X K, ZHANG Y, WANG L J, et al. Evolutionary epigenomic analyses in mammalian early embryos reveal species-specific innovations and conserved principles of imprinting[J]. Science Advances, 2021, 7(48): eabi6178.
[17]
ZHANG J Y, LI R B, LUO R J, et al. Tracing and capturing the epiblast pluripotency of sheep preimplantation embryos[J]. Advanced Science, 2025, 12(36): e17764.
[18]
CHEN Z Y, DJEKIDEL M N, ZHANG Y. Distinct dynamics and functions of H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3 in mouse preimplantation embryos[J]. Nature Genetics, 2021, 53(4): 551-563.
[19]
BOROVIAK T, STIRPARO G G, DIETMANN S, et al. Single cell transcriptome analysis of human, marmoset and mouse embryos reveals common and divergent features of preimplan-tation development[J]. Development, 2018, 145(21): dev167833.
[20]
SHA Q Q, WU Y W, JIA M Y, et al. Maternal mRNA clearance is associated with the prevention of precocious transcription and genome instability in mouse early embryos[J]. Science Bulletin, 2026, 71(5): 1003-1007.
[21]
KOROTKEVICH E, NIWAYAMA R, COURTOIS A, et al. The apical domain is required and sufficient for the first lineage segregation in the mouse embryo[J]. Developmental Cell, 2017, 40(3): 235-247.e7.
[22]
ZHI M L, GAO D F, YAO Y X, et al. Elucidation of the pluripotent potential of bovine embryonic lineages facilitates the establishment of formative stem cell lines[J]. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2024, 81(1): 427.
[23]
NOWOTSCHIN S, SETTY M, KUO Y Y, et al. The emergent landscape of the mouse gut endoderm at single-cell resolution[J]. Nature, 2019, 569(7756): 361-367.
[24]
SAIZ N, WILLIAMS K M, SESHAN V E, et al. Asynchronous fate decisions by single cells collectively ensure consistent lineage composition in the mouse blastocyst[J]. Nature Com-munications, 2016, 7: 13463.
[25]
SIMPSON L, STRANGE A, KLISCH D, et al. A single-cell atlas of pig gastrulation as a resource for comparative embryology[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 5210.
[26]
RAMOS-IBEAS P, SANG F, ZHU Q F, et al. Pluripotency and X chromosome dynamics revealed in pig pre-gastrulating embryos by single cell analysis[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 500.
[27]
LIU T B, LI J, YU L Q, et al. Cross-species single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals pre-gastrulation developmental differences among pigs, monkeys, and humans[J]. Cell Discovery, 2021, 7: 8.
[28]
EVANS M J, KAUFMAN M H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos[J]. Nature, 1981, 292(5819): 154-156.
[29]
MARTIN G R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells[J]. Proceedings of the National Aca-demy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1981, 78(12): 7634-7638.
[30]
HANDYSIDE A, HOOPER M L, KAUFMAN M H, et al. Towards the isolation of embryonal stem cell lines from the sheep[J]. Roux’s Archives of Developmental Biology, 1987, 196(3): 185-190.
[31]
NOTARIANNI E, LAURIE S, MOOR R M, et al. Maintenance and differentiation in culture of pluripotential embryonic cell lines from pig blastocysts[J]. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement, 1990, 41: 51-56.
[32]
STROJEK R M, REED M A, HOOVER J L, et al. A method for cultivating morphologically undifferentiated embryonic stem cells from porcine blastocysts[J]. Theriogenology, 1990, 33(4): 901-913.
[33]
SAITO S, STRELCHENKO N, NIEMANN H. Bovine embryonic stem cell-like cell lines cultured over several passages[J]. Roux’s Archives of Developmental Biology, 1992, 201(3): 134-141.
[34]
NICHOLS J, SMITH A. Naive and primed pluripotent states[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2009, 4(6): 487-492.
[35]
YANG Y, LIU B, XU J, et al. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells with in vivo embryonic and extraembryonic potency[J]. Cell, 2017, 169(2): 243-257.e25.
[36]
SMITH A. Formative pluripotency: the executive phase in a developmental continuum[J]. Development, 2017, 144(3): 365-373.
[37]
SHEN H, YANG M, LI S Y, et al. Mouse totipotent stem cells captured and maintained through spliceosomal repression[J]. Cell, 2021, 184(11): 2843-2859.e20.
[38]
PENG B, WANG Q Y, ZHANG F X, et al. Mouse totipotent blastomere-like cells model embryogenesis from zygotic genome activation to post implantation[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2025, 32(3): 391-408.e11.
[39]
YANG J, RYAN D J, WANG W, et al. Establishment of mouse expanded potential stem cells[J]. Nature, 2017, 550(7676): 393-397.
[40]
GAO X F, NOWAK-IMIALEK M, CHEN X, et al. Establishment of porcine and human expanded potential stem cells[J]. Nature Cell Biology, 2019, 21(6): 687-699.
[41]
ZHAO L X, GAO X F, ZHENG Y X, et al. Establishment of bovine expanded potential stem cells[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(15): e2018505118.
[42]
TAKASHIMA Y, GUO G, LOOS R, et al. Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human[J]. Cell, 2014, 158(6): 1254-1269.
[43]
THEUNISSEN T W, POWELL B E, WANG H Y, et al. Systematic identification of culture conditions for induction and maintenance of naive human pluripotency[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2014, 15(4): 471-487.
[44]
KINOSHITA M, BARBER M, MANSFIELD W, et al. Capture of mouse and human stem cells with features of formative pluripotency[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2021, 28(3): 453-471.e8.
[45]
YU L Q, WEI Y L, SUN H X, et al. Derivation of intermediate pluripotent stem cells amenable to primordial germ cell specification[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2021, 28(3): 550-567.e12.
[46]
KOJIMA Y, KAUFMAN-FRANCIS K, STUDDERT J B, et al. The transcriptional and functional properties of mouse epiblast stem cells resemble the anterior primitive streak[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2014, 14(1): 107-120.
[47]
ZHANG M L, WANG C Y, JIANG H B, et al. Derivation of novel naive-like porcine embryonic stem cells by a reprogramming factor-assisted strategy[J]. The FASEB Journal, 2019, 33(8): 9350-9361.
[48]
ZHANG X, XUE B H, LI Y, et al. A novel chemically defined serum- and feeder-free medium for undifferentiated growth of porcine pluripotent stem cells[J]. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 2019, 234(9): 15380-15394.
[49]
LI Y, WU S, LI X C, et al. Wnt signaling associated small molecules improve the viability of pPSCs in a PI3K/Akt pathway dependent way[J]. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 2020, 235(7/8): 5811-5822.
[50]
LI C, HAN X J, WANG J, et al. Mixed-lineage leukemia 1 inhibition enhances the differentiation potential of bovine embryonic stem cells by increasing H3K4 mono-methylation at active promoters[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(15): 11901.
[51]
JIN M H, HUANG S H, ZHOU S W, et al. Efficient derivation of stable sheep embryonic stem cells opens a new avenue for agricultural and biomedical application[J]. Journal of Advanced Research, 2026, 82: 155-169.
[52]
CHEN X, GUO Z, TONG X Y, et al. Derivation of embryonic stem cells across avian species[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2025: 1-13.
[53]
KINOSHITA M, KOBAYASHI T, PLANELLS B, et al. Pluripotent stem cells related to embryonic disc exhibit common self-renewal requirements in diverse livestock species[J]. Deve-lopment, 2021, 148(23): dev199901.
[54]
YANG L, DI A Q, SONG L S, et al. Generation of modified cows and sheep from spermatid-like haploid embryonic stem cells[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2025: 1-9.
[55]
LUO Q, PUI H P, CHEN J Y, et al. Epiblast-like stem cells established by Wnt/β-catenin signaling manifest distinct features of formative pluripotency and germline competence[J]. Cell Reports, 2023, 42(1): 112021.
[56]
CHOI K H, LEE D K, KIM S W, et al. Chemically defined media can maintain pig pluripotency network in vitro [J]. Stem Cell Reports, 2019, 13(1): 221-234.
[57]
BOGLIOTTI Y S, WU J, VILARINO M, et al. Efficient derivation of stable primed pluripotent embryonic stem cells from bovine blastocysts[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(9): 2090-2095.
[58]
OKAE H, TOH H, SATO T, et al. Derivation of human trophoblast stem cells[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2018, 22(1): 50-63.e6.
[59]
PARK C H, JEOUNG Y H, UH K J, et al. Extraembryonic endoderm (XEN) cells capable of contributing to embryonic chimeras established from pig embryos[J]. Stem Cell Reports, 2021, 16(1): 212-223.
[60]
WANG Y J, MING H, YU L Q, et al. Establishment of bovine trophoblast stem cells[J]. Cell Reports, 2023, 42(5): 112439.
[61]
PINZÓN-ARTEAGA C A, WANG Y J, WEI Y L, et al. Bovine blastocyst-like structures derived from stem cell cultures[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2023, 30(5): 611-616.e7.
[62]
SUASNAVAS E A, HEYWOOD S, WARD A, et al. Isolation and characterization of trophoblast-derived stem-like cells from peri-implantation porcine embryos[J]. Animal Reproduction Science, 2015, 154: 128-141.
[63]
KIM E, CAI L, CHOI H, et al. Distinct properties of putative trophoblast stem cells established from somatic cell nuclear-transferred pig blastocysts[J]. Biological Research, 2024, 57(1): 35.
[64]
ZHANG M L, JIN Y, ZHAO L H, et al. Derivation of porcine extra-embryonic endoderm cell lines reveals distinct signaling pathway and multipotency states[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021, 22(23): 12918.
[65]
MING H, SCATOLIN G N, OJEDA-ROJAS O A, et al. Establishment of bovine extraembryonic endoderm stem cells enables efficient blastoid formation[J]. Cell Reports, 2025, 44(6): 115707.
[66]
SMITH M K, CLARK C C, MCCOSKI S R. Technical note: improving the efficiency of generating bovine extraembryonic endoderm cells[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2020, 98(7): skaa222.
[67]
WANG H N, ZHONG L, WANG Z F, et al. Wnt inhibition safeguards porcine embryonic stem cells from the acquisition of extraembryonic endoderm cell fates[J]. Advanced Science, 2025, 12(17): 2416802.
[68]
VIUKOV S, SHANI T, BAYERL J, et al. Human primed and naïve PSCs are both able to differentiate into trophoblast stem cells[J]. Stem Cell Reports, 2022, 17(11): 2484-2500.
[69]
XU S, WANG S D, TAM T T K K, et al. Derivation of trophoblast stem cells from human expanded potential stem cells[J]. STAR Protocols, 2023, 4(2): 102354.
[70]
XIANG J Z, WANG H N, SHI B B, et al. Pig blastocyst-like structure models from embryonic stem cells[J]. Cell Discovery, 2024, 10: 72.
[71]
MALIK H N, SINGHAL D K, SAINI S, et al. Derivation of oocyte-like cells from putative embryonic stem cells and parthenogenetically activated into blastocysts in goat[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 10086.
[72]
RAWAT H, KORNHERR J, ZAWADA D, et al. Recapitulating porcine cardiac development in vitro: from expanded potential stem cell to embryo culture models[J]. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2023, 11: 1111684.
[73]
SHIUE Y L, YANG J R, LIAO Y J, et al. Derivation of porcine pluripotent stem cells for biomedical research[J]. Theriogenology, 2016, 86(1): 176-181.
[74]
LI M S, GUO X Y, CHENG L X, et al. Porcine kidney organoids derived from Naïve-like embryonic stem cells[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024, 25(1): 682.
[75]
HOU Z C, AN L, HAN J Y, et al. Revolutionize livestock breeding in the future: an animal embryo-stem cell breeding system in a dish[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2018, 9(1): 90.
[76]
ZHOU X Y, GAO C, ZHAO W X, et al. Advances in the study of pluripotent stem cells in livestock[J]. Cell Proliferation, 2025, 58(8): e70008.
[77]
ZHU G X, GAO D F, LI L Z, et al. Generation of three-dimensional meat-like tissue from stable pig epiblast stem cells[J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14: 8163.
[78]
YAO Y, ZHU G, ZHI M, et al. Generation of multitissue cell-cultivated meat via multidirectional differentiation of stable porcine epiblast stem cells [J]. Nature communications, 2026, 17(1).
[79]
ZEHORAI E, MAOR-SHOSHANI A, MOLOTSKI N, et al. From fertilised oocyte to cultivated meat - harnessing bovine embryonic stem cells in the cultivated meat industry[J]. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 2023, 36(2): 124-132.
[80]
JARA T C, PARK K, VAHMANI P, et al. Stem cell-based strategies and challenges for production of cultivated meat[J]. Nature Food, 2023, 4(10): 841-853.
[81]
KIM S, BEIER A, SCHREYER H B, et al. Environmental life cycle assessment of a novel cultivated meat burger patty in the United States[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(23): 16133.
[82]
RODRÍGUEZ ESCOBAR M I, CADENA E, NHU T T, et al. Analysis of the cultured meat production system in function of its environmental footprint: current status, gaps and recommendations[J]. Foods, 2021, 10(12): 2941.
[83]
WANG D S, VILLENAVE R, STOKAR-REGENSCHEIT N, et al. Human organoids as 3D in vitro platforms for drug discovery: opportunities and challenges[J]. Nature Reviews Drug Dis-covery, 2026, 25(3): 204-226.
[84]
DE LAU W B M, WIJNAKKER J J A P M, VAN SON G J F, et al. A single-chain derivative of an integrin-activating antibody potentiates organoid growth in Matrigel and collagen hydrogels[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2025: 1-11.
[85]
POSFAI E, SCHELL J P, JANISZEWSKI A, et al. Evaluating totipotency using criteria of increasing stringency[J]. Nature Cell Biology, 2021, 23(1): 49-60.
[86]
ALFEGHALY C, ROUGEULLE C. X chromosome inactivation in mammals: general principles and species-specific consi-derations[J]. EMBO Reports, 2025, 26(14): 3478-3490.
[87]
MORATA TARIFA C, LÓPEZ NAVAS L, AZKONA G, et al. Chimeras for the twenty-first century[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2020, 40(3): 283-291.
[88]
LI Y M, SUN S Y, XU Y T, et al. Efficient somatic cell nuclear transfer by overcoming both pre- and post-implantation epigenetic barriers[J]. Advanced Science, 2025, 12(37): e04669.
[89]
KOMOR A C, KIM Y B, PACKER M S, et al. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage[J]. Nature, 2016, 533(7603): 420-424.
[90]
ANZALONE A V, RANDOLPH P B, DAVIS J R, et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA[J]. Nature, 2019, 576(7785): 149-157.
[91]
NIU D, WEI H J, LIN L, et al. Inactivation of porcine endogenous retrovirus in pigs using CRISPR-Cas9[J]. Science, 2017, 357(6357): 1303-1307.
[92]
PHILLIPS K G, ALJABBAN I, WOLBROM D H, et al. Cardiac xenotransplantation: current state and future directions[J]. Circulation, 2025, 152(1): 58-73.
[93]
GAO R, WANG C F, GAO Y W, et al. Inhibition of aberrant DNA re-methylation improves post-implantation development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2018, 23(3): 426-435.e5.
[94]
LIU X, WANG Y Z, GAO Y P, et al. H3K9 demethylase KDM4E is an epigenetic regulator for bovine embryonic development and a defective factor for nuclear reprogramming[J]. Development, 2018, 145(4): dev158261.
[95]
GAO Y, WU F F, TANG D D, et al. H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 are epigenetic barriers to somatic cell nuclear transfer in rabbits[J]. American Journal of Translational Research, 2025, 17(4): 3094-3108.
[96]
ZHANG X L, GAO S R, LIU X Y. Advance in the role of epigenetic reprogramming in somatic cell nuclear transfer-mediated embryonic development[J]. Stem Cells International, 2021, 2021: 6681337.
[97]
MOURA M T. Cloning by SCNT: integrating technical and biology-driven advances[J]. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2023, 2647: 1-35.
[98]
ZHOU K, WANG T T, ZHANG J J, et al. LEUTX regulates porcine embryonic genome activation in somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos[J]. Cell Reports, 2024, 43(6): 114372.
[1] 鞠思含, 朱梁, 赵温倩, 刘忠华, 翁晓刚. DLK1-DIO3印记簇在家畜胚胎发育中的研究进展[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2026, 22(9): 95-102.
[2] 刘波, 韩赛铮, 沙芳芳, 沈文文, 唐子怀, 吴伟伟, 郑文新, 周世卫, 魏迎辉, 王小龙. 基于家畜ESCs创制克隆动物的挑战与展望[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2026, 22(9): 55-65.
[3] 张金颖, 赵凡, 李欣, 曹素英. 反刍家畜上胚层干细胞建系及其应用前景[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2026, 22(9): 47-54.
[4] 时禹, 朱梁, 鞠思含, 刘忠华, 翁晓刚. 家畜早期胚胎细胞谱系分化调控研究进展[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2026, 22(9): 113-120.
[5] 赵晴, 赵志炎, 李雪玲. 家畜多能干细胞向雄性生殖细胞分化的研究进展[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2026, 22(9): 103-112.
[6] 王添添, 卲嘉豪, 段文淼, 鲁佳宁, 曾检华, 刘小红, 袁晓龙. 毛色遗传多样性在家畜遗传育种中的研究进展[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2026, 22(5): 108-115.
[7] 黄艳娜,蒋钦杨. 新农科背景下 《家畜环境卫生与牧场设计》 课程思政教学改革与实践[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2023, 19(9): 155-161.
[8] 张博, 肖鹏, 周金陈, 尚江华. 中国水牛种质资源质量提升:机遇与挑战[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2022, 18(10): 17-21.
[9] 哈依那提·哈力, 巴哈尔古丽·阿布达克木. 小花棘豆中毒对家畜繁殖机能的影响[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2021, 17(1): 111-112.
[10] . 布鲁氏菌病防护4要点[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2019, 15(1): 0-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!