1 畜禽肠道菌群概述
1.1 肠道菌群的组成与定植
1.2 肠道菌群的主要功能
1.3 影响畜禽肠道菌群的因素
2 肠道菌群失调与腹泻的病理关系
2.1 肠道菌群失调的定义与类型
图4 大肠杆菌-志贺氏菌、克雷伯氏菌和变形杆菌之间的相关网络以及差异代谢物[36] Fig. 4 Correlation network and differential metabolites among escherichia coli–shigella, klebsiella and proteus |
|
曹宇豪(2001—),男,河南周口人,硕士研究生,研究方向:动物遗传育种与繁殖,E-mail:1004159050@qq.com。 |
收稿日期: 2025-11-10
网络出版日期: 2026-06-17
基金资助
四川省科技计划(2021YFYZ0007)
四川省科技计划(2021YFYZ0030)
国家现代农业产业技术体系四川生猪创新团队(SCCXTD-2025-8)
国家生猪产业技术体系(CARS-35)
Relationship between intestinal dysbiosis and diarrhea in livestock and poultry, and related treatments
Received date: 2025-11-10
Online published: 2026-06-17
畜禽腹泻是全球畜牧业面临的重大健康挑战,传统依赖抗生素的防治策略面临耐药菌扩散及药物残留等严峻局限。该文系统梳理了畜禽肠道菌群组成与功能,分析了菌群失调通过破坏肠道屏障、扰乱分泌功能及免疫调节引发腹泻的机制,并阐述了四大干预策略:一是以益生菌(如乳杆菌、芽孢杆菌)、益生元(如低聚果糖、菊粉)及合生元为核心的微生态制剂调控;二是涵盖日粮优化与功能性添加剂(有机酸、酶制剂、植物提取物)的营养调控;三是抗生素的合理使用及其替代品(噬菌体、抗菌肽、卵黄抗体)的应用;四是粪菌移植技术。这些策略在降低腹泻发生率、替代抗生素治疗方面展现出巨大潜力,但仍面临菌株定植效率低、跨物种标准化不足、生物安全风险等挑战。未来需深入解析关键功能菌群作用机制,研发高靶向性微生态制剂,整合多组学数据构建菌群-宿主互作网络,建立精准防控体系,推动绿色健康养殖。
曹宇豪 , 邹宇 , 胡世杰 , 牛佳琦 , 朱砺 , 赵叶 , 甘麦邻 . 畜禽肠道菌群失调与腹泻的关系及相关治疗[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2026 , 22(5) : 21 -31 . DOI: 10.19543/j.cnki.1673-4556.20260330.001
Diarrhea in livestock and poultry constitutes a major health challenge to the global animal husbandry industry. Traditional prevention and control strategies that rely heavily on antibiotics are plagued by severe limitations, including the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and drug residues. In this paper, the composition and function of intestinal flora in livestock and poultry are systematically reviewed, and the mechanism of dysbacteriosis causing diarrhea, which involves destroying the intestinal barrier, disrupting secretory function, and immune regulation, is analyzed. Four intervention strategies were described: First, probiotics ( such as Lactobacillus, Bacillus ), prebiotics ( such as fructooligosaccharides, inulin ) and synbiotics were used as the core of probiotics regulation; the second is to cover diet optimization and nutritional regulation of functional additives ( organic acids, enzyme preparations, plant extracts ); third, the rational use of antibiotics and their substitutes ( phages, antimicrobial peptides, egg yolk antibodies ); fourth, fecal bacteria transplantation technology. These strategies hold great potential for reducing the incidence of diarrhea and replacing antibiotic therapy, yet they still face challenges such as low strain colonization efficiency, insufficient cross-species standardization, and biosafety risks. Moving forward, it is essential to further elucidate the mechanisms of action of key functional microbiota, develop highly targeted microecological preparations, integrate multi-omics data to construct microbiota-host interaction networks, establish a precise prevention and control system, and advance green and healthy breeding practices.
图4 大肠杆菌-志贺氏菌、克雷伯氏菌和变形杆菌之间的相关网络以及差异代谢物[36] Fig. 4 Correlation network and differential metabolites among escherichia coli–shigella, klebsiella and proteus |
| [1] |
吕颖捷, 黄敏, 柴凤兰, 等. 畜禽养殖中抗生素的使用现状、问题及对策[J]. 中兽医学杂志, 2024(5): 43-45.
|
| [2] |
陈红英, 王月颖, 傅思武. 抗生素在养殖业中的应用现状[J]. 现代畜牧科技, 2019(5): 1-3.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
尚智援, 李海花, 窦彩霞, 等. 丁酸梭菌调节畜禽肠道菌群机制的研究进展[J]. 中国饲料, 2020(13): 1-5.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
王敏娟. 乳酸菌调控氧浓度改善动物肠炎机制的研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
吴静璇, 李素芬, 张丽阳, 等. 丁酸梭菌对畜禽抗氧化能力和产品品质影响的研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2022, 58(12): 66-70.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
温家姝, 胡彩虹, 崔世豪, 等. 微生态制剂对家禽肠道健康影响的研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(4): 1851-1858.
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
陈胜宏, 闻晓波, 冉旭华. 抗菌药物影响禽肠道菌群及免疫应答研究进展[J]. 动物医学进展, 2024, 45(6): 90-94.
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
舒雁, 惠华英, 谭周进. 肠道短链脂肪酸与腹泻的相关性研究进展[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2022, 21(9): 937-943.
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
刘力. 运用微生态平衡, 拯救畜禽规模化养殖——启动微生物界链条中的内在协同“机制”之对策[J]. 中国动物保健, 2007, 9(9): 19-21.
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
徐灵齐. 肠道菌群通过TLR4/NF-κB信号通路对LPS诱导的急性肺损伤的影响[D]. 重庆: 重庆医科大学, 2021.
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
李淼, 何海娟, 李忠秋, 等. 益生菌在畜禽肠道健康中的作用研究进展[J]. 饲料研究, 2024, 47(6): 154-158.
|
| [64] |
张津慎, 赵清梅, 陈颖, 等. 益生菌在畜禽肠道疾病防治中的研究进展[J]. 农业科学研究, 2022, 43(1): 49-56.
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
乔宏兴, 边传周, 王永芬. 益生菌—中药复合制剂对猪腹泻的预防和治疗作用[J]. 当代畜牧, 2013(18): 42-44.
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
张龙舟, 高青山, 崔莲花, 等. 基于肠道菌群调控治疗动物腹泻的相关研究进展[J]. 饲料研究, 2021, 44(12): 108-112.
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
魏媛媛, 张艳楠, 樊艺萌, 等. 仔猪断奶应激综合征与腹泻型肠易激综合征肝郁脾虚证对比研究[J]. 神经药理学报, 2022, 12(3): 44-51.
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
刘秋瑾, 尹珺伊, 张军, 等. 饲料中常见霉菌毒素污染情况及其对畜禽毒性作用的研究进展[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2023, 44(4): 47-54.
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
王通. ETEC菌毛和肠毒素双重阻断特异性多价卵黄抗体研发[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2020.
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
韩齐. 粪菌移植对人工哺乳仔猪腹泻的缓解作用机制的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2023.
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |